Sign In

New tests and biomarkers are improving diagnosis

Accu­rate­ly diag­nos­ing prostate can­cer con­tin­ues to be a major chal­lenge due to the lim­it­ed test­ing meth­ods cur­rent­ly avail­able. How­ev­er, researchers are inves­ti­gat­ing new bio­mark­ers and improved screen­ing tech­niques that can accu­rate­ly detect the can­cer at an ear­ly stage, and iden­ti­fy which tumours are like­ly to be high or low-risk.

Ini­tial screen­ing tests for prostate can­cer pri­mar­i­ly include the dig­i­tal rec­tal exam­i­na­tion (DRE) and prostate-spe­cif­ic anti­gen (PSA) blood test. Although PSA screen­ing can detect can­cer­ous cell growth, it can­not show whether the growth is benign or malig­nant, or how aggres­sive it is. Based on ini­tial PSA and DRE results, a biop­sy is typ­i­cal­ly car­ried out to detect poten­tial can­cer in the prostate.

How­ev­er, the PSA test is not com­plete­ly reli­able. While a high­er PSA pro­tein lev­el can be a clas­sic mark­er for prostate can­cer, it can also be caused by an infec­tion, a non-can­cer­ous enlarged prostate or even recent exer­cise. Con­se­quent­ly, up to 70 per cent of men with raised lev­els of PSA do not actu­al­ly have can­cer (a false-pos­i­tive result), while around 15 per cent with a nor­mal PSA lev­el will have prostate can­cer (a false-neg­a­tive result).

Increas­ing evi­dence is now point­ing towards the harm of over-diag­no­sis and over-treat­ment of sus­pect­ed prostate can­cer, trig­gered by PSA results. In May, a US gov­ern­ment pan­el said that men should not get rou­tine­ly screened for prostate can­cer using the PSA test. The pan­el found lit­tle evi­dence that PSA test­ing saves men’s lives and that it caus­es too much unnec­es­sary harm from the treat­ment of tumours that would nev­er have killed them. Such treat­ments include unnec­es­sary prostate gland removal surgery.

Sci­en­tists have designed a blood test that reads genet­ic changes like a bar­code and picks out aggres­sive prostate can­cers

Oth­er tests may be used for men diag­nosed with ear­ly or local­ly advanced prostate can­cer and these will depend on symp­toms. Some men are found to have prostate can­cer after being inves­ti­gat­ed for bone pain, using an iso­tope bone scan, CT scan or MRI scan.

At present, based on ini­tial PSA results, physi­cians will con­firm the pres­ence and assess the aggres­sive­ness of prostate can­cer in a vari­ety of ways, which may include a nee­dle biop­sy of the prostate, blood tests and radi­o­log­i­cal scans, such as X‑rays, CT scans and MRI scans. How­ev­er, experts say these meth­ods are only mod­er­ate­ly accu­rate. For exam­ple, a biop­sy will fail to detect can­cer­ous cells in approx­i­mate­ly 5 to 10 per cent of men with prostate can­cer.

But recent research has revealed new bio­mark­ers and devel­oped new tests for improved prostate can­cer diag­no­sis. Bio­mark­ers help to dif­fer­en­ti­ate between the low and high-risk types of can­cer, and are cru­cial to decide if and what type of treat­ment a patient needs.

Ear­li­er this year, the US Food and Drug Admin­is­tra­tion approved a new urine test that mea­sures a gene present in prostate can­cer. The PCA3 (prostate can­cer gene 3) is the first mol­e­c­u­lar test to help deter­mine whether a man, who has received a neg­a­tive biop­sy result, needs a repeat biop­sy.

Researchers at the Uni­ver­si­ty of Sur­rey are also devel­op­ing a new urine test that mea­sures lev­els of a pro­tein called EN2. A study found that test­ing for the pro­tein could accu­rate­ly iden­ti­fy 66 per cent of men with prostate can­cer and cor­rect­ly rule out the dis­ease in almost 90 per cent of men with­out the dis­ease.

One of the researchers, Pro­fes­sor Hard­ev Pand­ha, says: “The prospect of an imme­di­ate result that does­n’t involve a blood test or an embar­rass­ing exam­i­na­tion may be help­ful in get­ting more men with uri­nary symp­toms to seek med­ical help.” How­ev­er, the research is at an ear­ly stage and fur­ther study is need­ed.

In Octo­ber, sci­en­tists announced they had dis­cov­ered a new diag­nos­tic mark­er for prostate can­cer, Beta-2-syn­trophin, which could help doc­tors to dis­tin­guish between low- and high-risk lev­el dis­ease.

In addi­tion, sci­en­tists have recent­ly designed a blood test that reads genet­ic changes like a bar­code and picks out aggres­sive prostate can­cers by their par­tic­u­lar pat­tern of gene activ­i­ty. Researchers believe the blood test could even­tu­al­ly be used along­side the exist­ing PSA test at diag­no­sis to select patients who need imme­di­ate treat­ment. The test is unique because it mea­sures changes in the pat­tern of gene activ­i­ty in blood cells trig­gered by a tumour else­where in the body.

Prostate cancer factfile

IT’S BEEN A HARD DAY’S NIGHT

Men who work nights are almost three times as like­ly to devel­op prostate can­cer as those who work day shifts, accord­ing to new research. They are also at much greater risk of a num­ber of oth­er types of can­cer, with high­er rates of tumours in the bow­el, blad­der and lungs. Night shifts are thought to harm the body through the sup­pres­sion of mela­tonin, a hor­mone pro­duced by the pineal gland in the brain that helps reg­u­late when peo­ple sleep and when they wake up.

LINK WITH BREAST CANCER

Sci­en­tists have iden­ti­fied genet­ic links between prostate can­cer and breast can­cer. The risk of prostate can­cer may increase in men who have a fam­i­ly his­to­ry of breast can­cer and/or ovar­i­an can­cer. Muta­tions of two genes, known as brca1 and brca2, can also result in high­er risks of breast and ovar­i­an can­cer in women. For men who have a fam­i­ly his­to­ry of breast can­cer, genet­ic test­ing may there­fore pro­vide some infor­ma­tion about whether they share the same high-risk genet­ic muta­tions.

NEW DRUGS TO BE LAUNCHED

Two new prostate can­cer drugs for treat­ing advanced cas­es of prostate can­cer are being launched on to the mar­ket. In August, the US Food and Drug Admin­is­tra­tion approved the pill Xtan­di for treat­ing men with advanced prostate can­cer that has returned or spread despite major med­ical treat­ments. Anoth­er drug, enza­lu­tamide, which can help to extend sur­vival and improve qual­i­ty of life in men with advanced prostate can­cer, is also due to be licensed in the UK ear­ly next year.

LACK OF AWARENESS SURVEY

A recent sur­vey by Janssen Biotech in the Unit­ed States reveals a sig­nif­i­cant lack of aware­ness in men about the facts of prostate can­cer. A major­i­ty (93 per cent) of the men sur­veyed failed to cor­rect­ly iden­ti­fy at least two of the key symp­toms. The results also show that most of the men sur­veyed (63 per cent) believe they won’t be diag­nosed with prostate can­cer and more than half (52 per cent) believe that, if they are diag­nosed, the dis­ease will not be fatal.

SCOTLAND FOLLOWS REST OF UK

A drug that can extend the lives of men with incur­able prostate can­cer has been approved for use in Scot­land, the only part of the UK where abi­raterone was not avail­able on the NHS.  The Scot­tish Med­i­cines Con­sor­tium has now giv­en doc­tors the go-ahead to pre­scribe it. The drug was one of sev­er­al med­ica­tions said to have helped keep Locker­bie bomber Abdel­baset al-Megrahi alive after he returned to Libya.