Sign In

The age of the flexible worker

When Emma’s first child was born, she knew she could no longer work nine-to-five and com­mute to an office every day. As a strat­e­gy direc­tor at a large mar­ket­ing agency, it was time to change how she worked.

“When I had my first son five years ago, I knew that going back to five days in a stress­ful senior job wasn’t going be pos­si­ble,” Emma says. Now she works three days a week, one of which is from home. She decides how she sets her hours and whether she works from home or the office. She’s more pro­duc­tive and cre­ative in her job, and bet­ter able to tack­le the busy duties of a par­ent.

Had her com­pa­ny not offered this lev­el of flex­i­bil­i­ty, she would have left, she says. “I’m a hap­pi­er employ­ee.”

Emma is part of a grow­ing cohort of work­ers who want flex­i­bil­i­ty from their employ­ers. Flex­i­ble work­ing is a catch-all term for a host of dif­fer­ent ways of work­ing, which includes work­ing from home, part-time work, flex­itime and com­pressed hours. Accord­ing to a YouGov poll, 89 per cent of British work­ers believe flex­i­ble work­ing would boost their pro­duc­tiv­i­ty. Com­pa­nies are also aware of the scale of the issue: a LinkedIn sur­vey of UK busi­ness­es found that 75 per cent think allow­ing employ­ees the flex­i­bil­i­ty to work remote­ly and set their own hours is very impor­tant.

The ben­e­fits of flex­i­ble work­ing … include bet­ter morale, enabling those skilled employ­ees to be able to work around oth­er life com­mit­ments, reduced stress and absen­teeism, all lead­ing to reduced costs

- Ali­son Wat­son, Busi­ness Pro­gramme team leader at Arden Uni­ver­si­ty

Imple­ment­ing the process­es to facil­i­tate remote work­ing, how­ev­er, requires buy-in from lead­er­ship teams. For many com­pa­nies, their flex­i­ble poli­cies still lag behind. The same LinkedIn sur­vey found that while 57 per cent of com­pa­nies allow employ­ees to work remote­ly, it is only for some of the time, while 23 per cent said it is only under spe­cial cir­cum­stances. As more high-skilled work­ers view flex­i­bil­i­ty as a pro­fes­sion­al line in the sand, what is the cost of inflex­i­bil­i­ty?

“The ben­e­fits of flex­i­ble work­ing are vast,” says Ali­son Wat­son, Busi­ness Pro­gramme team leader at Arden Uni­ver­si­ty. “They include bet­ter morale, enabling those skilled employ­ees to be able to work around oth­er life com­mit­ments, reduced stress and absen­teeism, all lead­ing to reduced costs.”

[xyz-ihs snippet=“Cisco-Six”]

Emma did not wish to use her real name in this sto­ry as she says her com­pa­ny would not want her to speak pub­licly about its poli­cies. While her employ­er is now ful­ly sup­port­ive of her needs, she says she had to get the ball rolling her­self, by propos­ing a dif­fer­ent way of work­ing.

“I man­aged that con­ver­sa­tion,” she says. “They were very fair and bal­anced, but part of that was how I han­dled the con­ver­sa­tion.”

Helen Jamieson, founder and man­ag­ing direc­tor of Jaluch – an HR con­sul­tan­cy whose clients include Bupa and Visa – says the issue of flex­i­bil­i­ty is as much about change man­age­ment as it is employ­ee trust. “A lot of lead­ers find it hard to both trust and embrace new ways of work­ing or think­ing,” she says. “Ask man­agers whether they trust staff who are remote work­ers and you still get many voic­ing seri­ous con­cerns about how to suc­cess­ful­ly man­age them.”

Lead­ers must edu­cate them­selves on how flex­i­ble work­ing can ben­e­fit their busi­ness, Ms Jamieson says. They need to “lead from the top”, while at the same time “not ignore the fears and con­cerns peo­ple often have about change”.

Ms Wat­son agrees that engag­ing in a flex­i­ble work­ing cul­ture requires spe­cif­ic man­age­ment. “Some employ­ees need struc­ture and dis­ci­pline in order to func­tion effec­tive­ly,” she says.

Whether a com­pa­ny is able to offer flex­i­bil­i­ty in its work­ing prac­tices often depends on how pro­gres­sive it is in its over­all cul­ture. The size of a com­pa­ny plays a role here, as small­er com­pa­nies have a degree of agili­ty to respond faster to these employ­ee needs. “Some­times such a process may be seen as eas­i­er to imple­ment in less bureau­crat­ic organ­i­sa­tions,” Ms Wat­son says, though she notes that small­er com­pa­nies face chal­lenges of their own.

[xyz-ihs snippet=“Cisco-Eight”]

“With­in a small work­force, flex­i­ble work­ing pat­terns may not be easy to achieve as com­mu­ni­ca­tion amongst the team and with the cus­tomer will be essen­tial and will need to be main­tained at all times,” she says. “There will need to be ade­quate cov­er dur­ing stan­dard work­ing hours.” Tech­nol­o­gy has played a sig­nif­i­cant role in address­ing these issues, she adds, with the wide­spread use of online con­fer­enc­ing with­in many sec­tors offer­ing a viable solu­tion.

For Ms Jamieson, the size of the com­pa­ny is sec­ondary to the mind­set of the lead­er­ship team when it comes to deter­min­ing a flex­i­ble work­ing pol­i­cy. “Flex­i­ble work­ing demands that lead­ers trust their staff and that lead­ers are able to drop out­dat­ed prac­tices in favour of new prac­tices.”

[xyz-ihs snippet=“Cisco-Seven”]

The trend towards flex­i­ble work­ing start­ed with women, as work­ing moth­ers like Emma came back to work and need­ed to adjust their sched­ules. Dr Esther Canon­i­co of the Lon­don School of Eco­nom­ics’ Depart­ment of Man­age­ment, who stud­ies organ­i­sa­tion­al behav­iour and flex­i­ble work­ing, says that women join­ing the UK work­force changed the tra­di­tion­al idea of an employ­ee.

“Women bring with them dif­fer­ent val­ues and a dif­fer­ent under­stand­ing of what the respon­si­bil­i­ties are out­side of work.”

As broad­er atti­tudes towards work-life bal­ance change, how­ev­er, it’s now not just moth­ers who are inter­est­ed in flex­i­ble work­ing prac­tices. When Jo Hoop­er returned from three months off work with anx­i­ety and depres­sion, she need­ed the flex­i­bil­i­ty to man­age her men­tal health and return to work slow­ly. “I was giv­en flex­i­bil­i­ty and was able to work in the office for two days a week and then three days a week at home to begin with,” she said.

As an ambi­tious employ­ee in a lead­er­ship role, Ms Hoop­er said she tried mak­ing tweaks to the way she worked and lived for years to man­age her men­tal health and thrive at work, but that it just didn’t work. This year, Ms Hoop­er set up Mad and Sad Club, an ini­tia­tive to pro­vide train­ing to com­pa­nies look­ing to improve employ­ee men­tal well­be­ing.

“I realised that there were lots of sim­ple things that busi­ness­es could do to help peo­ple strug­gling and that peo­ple didn’t need to be ‘qual­i­fied’ or a clin­i­cian to do some­thing mean­ing­ful about men­tal health,” she said.

Ms Hoop­er does not think the solu­tion to deal­ing with men­tal health issues at work should be for every­one to become self-employed. “Flex­i­bil­i­ty is one of the things com­pa­nies can and should do more of,” she said. “By stick­ing to this arcane idea that we need to be in an office togeth­er for 8 hours a day, we’re sti­fling cre­ativ­i­ty and hold­ing peo­ple to work­ing stan­dards that aren’t nec­es­sary in a mod­ern world.”

For both Emma and Ms Hoop­er, flex­i­bil­i­ty is now a tal­ent acqui­si­tion and reten­tion issue. They are not alone in see­ing flex­i­ble work­ing as a staff ben­e­fit – accord­ing to a sur­vey by the jobs sites Mon­ster, a quar­ter of British work­ers would turn down a job offer if they were not able to work from home.

“Being able to man­age both work and life com­mit­ments is attrac­tive to an employ­ee, espe­cial­ly those that know their poten­tial worth to a com­pa­ny,” Ms Wat­son says. “Com­pa­nies that do offer such a process will be more attrac­tive to work for, there­in attract­ing the tal­ent­ed staff they’re look­ing for.”

For Emma, the abil­i­ty to work flex­i­bly is now sim­ply non-nego­tiable. “I will now nev­er, ever work for a com­pa­ny that doesn’t let me work like this,” she says. “It’s a hygiene fac­tor for me now.”