Sign In

Small is beautiful for data firms

When some­thing is called “big” it usu­al­ly does not work well for small firms, which make up most of our econ­o­my. But big data is dif­fer­ent.

Before the inter­net, com­pa­nies required not just expen­sive pro­duc­tion plants, but an equal­ly expen­sive logis­tics infra­struc­ture to bring con­tent to the doorsteps of con­sumers. The inter­net changed this. It was suf­fi­cient to have a serv­er con­nect­ed to the net.

But this did not elim­i­nate steep ini­tial invest­ments. Suc­cess­ful start-ups soon need data cen­tres with tens of thou­sands of servers. Ama­zon for exam­ple had to invest many mil­lions in tech­nol­o­gy, almost bank­rupt­ing it in its first years.

Con­trast this with big-data com­pa­ny Decide.com, for exam­ple. The Seat­tle-based start-up offers its cus­tomers accu­rate pre­dic­tions of whether the price of any of tens of thou­sands con­sumer prod­ucts, from cam­eras to wash­ing machines, is like­ly to increase or decrease, help­ing peo­ple to make well-timed buy­ing deci­sions.

To achieve this feat, it is nec­es­sary to col­lect bil­lions of data points from the inter­net every day and ser­vice hun­dreds of thou­sands of cus­tomers. But such a huge dig­i­tal imprint does not mean a com­pa­ny has to be equal­ly huge. There can be as few as 30 employ­ees and no need for a data cen­tre. Instead, dig­i­tal data stor­age and analy­sis capac­i­ty can be rent­ed.

The quin­tes­sen­tial big data start-up can be launched with lit­tle cost and, even as it grows to ser­vice hun­dreds of thou­sands, does not need to make huge invest­ments. It can sim­ply stay small and nim­ble. All the essen­tial build­ing blocks that used to be very cost­ly can be had on demand and at rel­a­tive­ly low price, so employ­ees can remain focused on real­is­ing the inno­v­a­tive ideas they have.

With big data, many of the tra­di­tion­al economies of scale and scope van­ish. Small firms do not even need to col­lect their own data. They can often license access to it from oth­er com­pa­nies that fail to see the val­ue in the data they have. So it is quite like­ly that big data will pro­vide a rich and fer­tile ground for a whole gen­er­a­tion of small firms that will be finan­cial­ly suc­cess­ful, but delib­er­ate­ly opt to stay small.

Exist­ing small firms, too, can ben­e­fit from big data. Until now, their size often lim­it­ed how much data they could col­lect, thus reduc­ing the val­ue of their analy­sis. In the big data age, com­pa­nies of all pro­por­tions will realise that data has val­ue much beyond the pri­ma­ry pur­pose for which it was col­lect­ed, but often they will not be able to reap that val­ue them­selves. So they’ll per­mit oth­ers to access their data for a fee.

In choos­ing a suit­able licensee, many com­pa­nies will be wary of hav­ing large cor­po­ra­tions with access to their data vaults. Small firms in con­trast are less of a threat and thus far more like­ly to be grant­ed access, open­ing a unique com­mer­cial oppor­tu­ni­ty to them.

So despite its name, in the big data age, small will be remark­ably beau­ti­ful when it comes to firm size.

Vik­tor May­er-Schön­berg­er is the Oxford Inter­net Insti­tute’s pro­fes­sor of inter­net gov­er­nance and reg­u­la­tion, and co-author, with Ken­neth Cuki­er, of Big Data: A Rev­o­lu­tion That Will Trans­form How We Live, Work and Think.