Sign In

Lord Browne: The importance of being yourself in life and work

In The Glass Closet you argue that running a company embracing diversity and inclusion is not just the moral thing to do, it’s good business as well. Why?

Many long-run­ning stud­ies show com­pa­nies that have inclu­sion as a fun­da­men­tal part of their lead­er­ship have great engage­ment of teams. And engaged teams pro­duce abnor­mal returns, over and above those of aver­age com­pa­nies. On aver­age, it’s about 2 per cent [more] prof­itabil­i­ty a year, so 20 per cent over ten years. That’s tough to get any oth­er way.

The sec­ond thing is that being inclu­sive allows you to recruit a diverse set of peo­ple, which means you get a bet­ter array of peo­ple. You get the best of the best and you also get diverse think­ing, which stops com­pa­nies from oper­at­ing in a bub­ble.

You make the point that when it comes to race and gender, issues of diversity and inclusivity are more visible. With lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) people, the issues might be harder to spot. Does this mean some companies fail to realise what they’re missing out on?

More and more com­pa­nies are under­stand­ing what they’re miss­ing out on and why this is impor­tant, but not every­body. And it’s been a long time in the com­ing. If you look at gen­der, I remem­ber at the start of my career, I don’t think there were any women’s toi­lets on the board floor. Over 50 years it’s got bet­ter, but it hasn’t reached the point where it’s sat­is­fac­to­ry. LGBT inclu­sion is behind that. After all, the law didn’t change until ’67 in this coun­try and atti­tudes took a much, much longer time to shift – so much so that we only recent­ly had gay mar­riage.

I also think there is a lack of role mod­els. If you say to some­one “Be your­self at work”, they might say “That’s great; I’d love to, but who’s been out and gay, and become a CEO?” Then you have to scratch your head – there’s only one at the moment and that’s Tim Cook of Apple. That’s very unusu­al because you’d think in the top 500 com­pa­nies in the world – on aver­age let’s say 5 per cent of the pop­u­la­tion is gay – why wouldn’t you expect 25 chief exec­u­tives to be gay?  So either 24 are still in the clos­et or there’s been some­thing odd about the selec­tion.

When Tim Cooke came out publicly, what was your reaction?

I was delight­ed. I thought it was a very impor­tant move because he crossed a thresh­old. When you’re in a lead­er­ship posi­tion, you can’t say that your pri­vate life is pri­vate. Actu­al­ly you’re owned and shared by your organ­i­sa­tion, and you should demon­strate your­self to be a role mod­el and a leader in all aspects. I was out­ed and then I resigned from BP because of the cir­cum­stances around that. I wish I’d come out ear­li­er, but that was then and this is now.

How much have things changed during your career?

It’s changed a lot now. In this coun­try, pass­ing the leg­is­la­tion for gay mar­riage was a remark­able water­shed. It puts every­one on a lev­el play­field. So there are many parts of soci­ety where atti­tudes have changed and it’s much eas­i­er to be your­self. But it’s more dif­fi­cult in insti­tu­tion­al life – cor­po­ra­tions tend to be very con­ser­v­a­tive. I remem­ber being inter­viewed by a well-known bank after pub­lish­ing my book and the inter­view­er had inter­viewed me for 20 min­utes or half an hour with­out once using the word “gay”. It’s because it was very dif­fi­cult to talk about it, and you have to respect and under­stand that. So atti­tudes take time to change, but I would say that the glass is half full.

If there are LGBT chief and senior executives at the top of large organisations who aren’t yet out, what would you say to them?

Well I can’t give advice because it would be gen­er­al advice for some­thing that’s very per­son­al. But I hope they will, at some stage in their life, come out. It would be real­ly deeply trag­ic not to be your­self, at least at some stage. But life is long, so you can pick your time. It would be great if they came out while they are still chief exec­u­tives, but they have to rec­on­cile them­selves with their fam­i­ly, with their sur­round­ings and prob­a­bly also with this point – that hav­ing lived a life where they haven’t said they’re gay, does it cre­ate a chal­lenge to their authen­tic­i­ty?

What about the idea that people’s private lives are just that – private? It’s the “don’t ask, don’t tell” approach. Does it fall short in your view?

Sort of. I think a lot of peo­ple like to behave like that: “What­ev­er you do in your pri­vate life is none of my busi­ness.” But, actu­al­ly, that nev­er is the case. When straight peo­ple get togeth­er, they do talk about their fam­i­lies and they do talk about what they did at the week­end, they do have pho­tographs of their near­est and dear­est around them. So, if you’re gay and you’re exclud­ed from that, you real­ly are exclud­ed, and life is very tough.

As a senior manager within a business, what can you do?

The most impor­tant thing is for the tone to be set from the top. Every sin­gle day, the sig­nal has to be out that inclu­sion is a fun­da­men­tal plank of the lead­er­ship – from the chief exec­u­tive and the senior peo­ple. They have to say it; they have to insist on it. And any­thing which is not inclu­sive should be instant­ly dealt with and nor­mal­ly pun­ished. Big­otry, exclu­sion – there can be no approx­i­ma­tion here. None.

Sec­ond­ly, they need to get every­body in the organ­i­sa­tion who’s a man­ag­er to have time on their agen­da to talk to peo­ple, to explain why it’s impor­tant to be inclu­sive and why they want peo­ple to be them­selves. Third­ly, you have to mea­sure the atti­tudes – what are peo­ple real­ly think­ing? And fourth­ly, you have to help peo­ple because every­body has an uncon­scious bias. It’s a human thing that every­one has an irra­tional bias towards some­thing, even if it’s some­thing triv­ial.

Lots of large corporate companies have a presence at Gay Pride events, with banners and staff wearing branded T‑shirts, but it can feel as though this is a one-off, that they don’t pin those same colours to the mast with the same enthusiasm at other times. Do you think some are guilty of “pink-washing”?

You can nev­er tell. I think that it’s bet­ter than noth­ing. But it’s noth­ing like enough. So the test is: how are they doing inter­nal­ly? Are they actu­al­ly wor­ry­ing about this? Is the chief exec­u­tive talk­ing about LGBT inclu­sion? Are they ask­ing their man­agers to allo­cate time to do this? Do they have the right net­works? Do they have straight allies in the net­works or is it just a ghet­to of LGBT peo­ple? Are they teach­ing peo­ple about how to dri­ve out bias? And, final­ly, are they apply­ing the same stan­dards to their sup­pli­ers as they are to them­selves? That’s actu­al­ly a very big test.

You ask your sup­pli­er of pota­toes, whether they’ve thought about how they’re deal­ing with LGBT peo­ple – do they have a pol­i­cy, does it work and do they take it seri­ous­ly? And if they say “no” then what do you do? Stop buy­ing the pota­toes or say it doesn’t mat­ter? That where the test is. If they pass those tests, then I think hav­ing T‑shirts is a great idea.

You’ve said in the past you regret telling your lawyers the version of events you did – that you met your former partner jogging in Battersea Park. But, when an injunction against the newspaper story failed because of that, it also began a chain of events which has resulted in you doing what you’re doing today. So, do you still regret it or do you think things have worked out for the best?

Who knows? It’s a very inter­est­ing ques­tion – the ques­tion of hid­den hands. But I deeply regret telling that lie. Many peo­ple said it was the sort of thing any­one would do. Nev­er­the­less, I hold myself to a pret­ty high stan­dard. I cor­rect­ed it pret­ty quick­ly, but it was a bad error of judg­ment. Mind you, it was an error of judg­ment to have met [Jeff] Cheva­lier the way that I did, through an escort site, and it was an even worse error of judg­ment to believe that it could have been con­vert­ed into a rela­tion­ship. So the whole thing was bad.

I was con­vinced I had to leave BP. When I resigned there was no doubt because I thought the [con­se­quences] would be dam­ag­ing to BP and I just want­ed to stop it. I left think­ing I would leave behind all my friends – that no one would speak to me. And, of course, exact­ly the reverse hap­pened. Peo­ple stopped me on the street, shook my hand and said “We’re right behind you”. I start­ed a new life, which has been enor­mous­ly refresh­ing. I did a very dif­fer­ent set of things and I met a lot of very inter­est­ing peo­ple. So, in some ways, maybe it was, what do they say? “Writ­ten in the book before it hap­pened” – who knows? But it has been an extra­or­di­nary jour­ney.

John Browne career timeline