Sign In

Road users on a journey to accepting driverless cars

The race is on between vehi­cle man­u­fac­tur­ers and tech­nol­o­gy firms to bring dri­ver­less cars to mar­ket. But a major new study of 3,000 road users shows dri­vers are unpre­pared for the changes this tech­nol­o­gy will bring.

The report, by insur­er Direct Line Group, reveals that only 39 per cent of UK cit­i­zens feel con­fi­dent to embrace dri­ver­less tech­nol­o­gy, while more than a third are scep­ti­cal of its ben­e­fits. The study cat­e­goris­es UK dri­vers based on their views of in-car tech­nol­o­gy.

Sev­en dis­tinct seg­ments were iden­ti­fied through the research and this found the open­ness to dri­ver­less tech­nol­o­gy is shaped by atti­tudes, not demo­graph­ics. The groups are tech­no geeks, automa­tion opti­mists, met­ro­pol­i­tan fam­i­lies, mid­dle-lan­ers, next-gen­er­a­tion petrol heads, retro petrol heads and risk-averse tra­di­tion­al­ists.

The research high­lights con­cerns for safe­ty and a lack of trust in autonomous tech­nol­o­gy as key bar­ri­ers to adop­tion of dri­ver­less cars. At the moment, only 18 per cent of UK cit­i­zens believe that arti­fi­cial­ly intel­li­gent machines would make bet­ter deci­sions than humans. Among them, mid­dle-lan­ers, who are more like­ly to be low-mileage dri­vers, are par­tic­u­lar­ly uncon­vinced of the even­tu­al safe­ty or afford­abil­i­ty of dri­ver­less vehi­cles.

Mean­while, expe­ri­en­tial ben­e­fits such as enjoy­ment of dri­ving also pre­vent dri­vers con­sid­er­ing dri­ver­less cars. Some 53 per cent say they enjoy dri­ving and would not want this plea­sure tak­en away. They include those clas­si­fied as petrol heads and risk-averse tra­di­tion­al­ists. Fur­ther­more, two-thirds would pre­fer a vehi­cle in which they are in con­trol most of the time, with tech­nol­o­gy only inter­ven­ing in an emer­gency.

“Con­sumers are in the ear­ly stages of the jour­ney into autonomous tech­nol­o­gy. They are get­ting accus­tomed to fea­tures on new cars such as autonomous emer­gency brak­ing and lane cor­rec­tion,” explains Dan Freed­man, direc­tor of motor devel­op­ment at Direct Line Group.

Mr Freed­man is con­vinced that the will­ing­ness to adopt dri­ver­less vehi­cles will increase as they become used more wide­ly and cus­tomers become accus­tomed to the tech­nol­o­gy. He adds: “There are a num­ber of groups who already acknowl­edge some of the like­ly future ben­e­fits of dri­ver­less cars, name­ly con­ve­nience and time-sav­ing. How­ev­er, when more cars with auto­mat­ed dri­ving fea­tures are seen safe­ly oper­at­ing on the road, these tech­nolo­gies will become of greater inter­est to the major­i­ty.”

But there are sev­er­al groups who are more like­ly to adopt the tech­nol­o­gy, espe­cial­ly those who find dri­ving dull or see it as a means to an end. These include in-car techies, who love to dri­ve and believe tech­nol­o­gy enhances their expe­ri­ence.

Con­sumers are in the ear­ly stages of the jour­ney into autonomous tech­nol­o­gy

Equal­ly, met­ro­pol­i­tan fam­i­lies, who make up 16 per cent of respon­dents and are like­ly to be young, live in Lon­don and want in-car social media updates, are con­vinced dri­ving can be improved by the tech­nol­o­gy, even if they ques­tion some of the safe­ty ben­e­fits.

Auto­mat­ed opti­mists, who make up 12 per cent of respon­dents, real­ly trust tech­nol­o­gy and are pos­i­tive about it being in con­trol. This group, who are typ­i­cal­ly keen for less stress­ful and safer jour­neys, tend to describe dri­ving as being unin­ter­est­ing.

The peo­ple who ulti­mate­ly use these vehi­cles will need to know the impact of their choice upon insur­ance. “Anoth­er chal­lenge will be how oth­er road users inter­act with these autonomous vehi­cles and, for instance, how acci­dents involv­ing vehi­cles with these future tech­nolo­gies are dealt with,” says Mr Freed­man. “The government’s upcom­ing Auto­mat­ed and Elec­tric Vehi­cle Bill will like­ly help address where lia­bil­i­ty resides and remove one area of uncer­tain­ty.”

Clear­ly, there are already poten­tial risk reduc­tions on offer from cars with advanced dri­ver assis­tance sys­tems, which include fea­tures such as autonomous emer­gency brak­ing. But the risks asso­ci­at­ed with vehi­cles crash­ing and who would be liable when tech­nol­o­gy is involved in mak­ing more of the deci­sions pose con­cerns for dri­vers, insur­ers and man­u­fac­tur­ers.

“Advances in dri­ver­less tech­nol­o­gy will cause seis­mic shifts for the motor­ing and insur­ance indus­try, and we need to under­stand what people’s atti­tudes, emo­tions and behav­iours to this new tech­nol­o­gy will be,” says Paul Ged­des, chief exec­u­tive at Direct Line Group. It is essen­tial the poten­tial ben­e­fits for road safe­ty are prop­er­ly com­mu­ni­cat­ed and that cus­tomers are sup­port­ed as they move to the new tech­nol­o­gy.

For insur­ers, the chal­lenge is to mea­sure risk prop­er­ly and to be clear about lia­bil­i­ty. The study reveals that ques­tions over lia­bil­i­ty are a major chal­lenge for the indus­try, with 45 per cent of peo­ple believ­ing man­u­fac­tur­ers of dri­ver­less tech­nol­o­gy should be account­able in an acci­dent. “Direct Line Group and the wider indus­try have a crit­i­cal role in the devel­op­ment and adop­tion of dri­ver­less cars on our roads, and how we can bet­ter pro­tect the pub­lic in the future,” adds Mr Ged­des.

Direct Line Group is part of two major projects study­ing auto­mat­ed dri­ving tech­nol­o­gy in prac­tice. These include MOVE_UK, which is exam­in­ing how to accel­er­ate the devel­op­ment and val­i­da­tion of auto­mat­ed dri­ving sys­tems, and soon-to-begin Street­wise that will look at devel­op­ment of advanced dri­ver assis­tance sys­tems and con­sumer ser­vices. Direct Line Group’s inclu­sion in these projects is an indi­ca­tion of the impor­tant role of insur­ers in sup­port­ing devel­op­ment.

Advances in dri­ver­less tech­nol­o­gy will cause seis­mic shifts for the motor­ing and insur­ance indus­try

As these tech­nolo­gies become more com­plex and sophis­ti­cat­ed, insur­ers will need to eval­u­ate their effec­tive­ness at reduc­ing road risk, and draw this under­stand­ing into under­writ­ing and even­tu­al­ly pric­ing. Mr Freed­man says: “The motor insur­ance indus­try has a role to play in com­mu­ni­cat­ing the poten­tial safe­ty ben­e­fits, through our will­ing­ness to under­write such cars, and in dri­ving adop­tion through low­er insur­ance pre­mi­ums where we feel they sig­nif­i­cant­ly reduce risk.”

Direct Line Group is work­ing to bring togeth­er car man­u­fac­tur­ers and insur­ers, through dia­logue and sup­port­ing research into the risk and lia­bil­i­ty land­scape. This will be essen­tial in secur­ing more accu­rate insur­ance, pro­tect­ing cus­tomers effec­tive­ly and sup­port­ing the devel­op­ment of safer roads.

To find out more about Direct Line motor insur­ance please vis­it directline.com