Sign In

Disease makes moving painful

Arthri­tis cur­rent­ly affects ten mil­lion peo­ple in the UK with 8.5 mil­lion suf­fer­ing from osteoarthri­tis. Six mil­lion are in con­stant pain with 1.5 mil­lion claim­ing dis­abil­i­ty liv­ing allowance. Although osteoarthri­tis can devel­op in peo­ple from their thir­ties onwards it is most fre­quent­ly seen in old­er peo­ple. The num­ber of peo­ple with osteoarthri­tis increas­es from one in five peo­ple in their fifties, to one in two in their eight­ies.

At its most severe, the con­di­tion makes the sim­plest of activ­i­ties, such as get­ting out of a chair or climb­ing the stairs, dif­fi­cult.

Osteoarthri­tis is caused by the loss of the car­ti­lage that nor­mal­ly lines the inner sur­faces at the ends of bones inside the joints. Being over­weight puts extra stress on weight-bear­ing joints, mak­ing pain and stiff­ness worse.

“We’re see­ing a lot more osteoarthri­tis because peo­ple are liv­ing longer,” says Pro­fes­sor David Isen­berg, aca­d­e­m­ic direc­tor of rheuma­tol­ogy at Uni­ver­si­ty Col­lege Lon­don. “If every­one over 70 was X‑rayed, you’d see evi­dence of it in all of them, but that doesn’t mean they’d all have pain and stiff­ness.

“There seems to be a com­bi­na­tion of ele­ments that con­tribute to whether some­one has pain and stiff­ness – one is genet­ic, the oth­er occu­pa­tion­al. For exam­ple, we see it in the knees and hips of peo­ple who have put extra stress on their joints dur­ing their life­time.

Patients need­ing hip and knee replace­ments gain less ben­e­fit from surgery if they’re made to wait as delay results in fur­ther dete­ri­o­ra­tion

“You’re also much more like­ly to be affect­ed if you’re obese. Dam­aged knees will hurt more if you’re car­ry­ing around 20 stones rather than ten.”

Painkillers, such as parac­eta­mol, are used to man­age the pain along with exer­cise and weight loss. Non-steroidal anti-inflam­ma­to­ry drugs (NSAIDs) are used to reduce swelling, while some peo­ple may get some pain relief from anti-inflam­ma­to­ry creams or gels. Steroid injec­tions can help, but are used spar­ing­ly because of side effects, such as bone dam­age.

Pro­fes­sor Isen­berg says patients often even­tu­al­ly turn to surgery. “When pain wakes some­one up every night, there’s no alter­na­tive to joint replace­ment,” he says. 

Fig­ures from the Nation­al Joint Reg­istry show the num­ber of knee and hip oper­a­tions went up dur­ing the four years from 2006 to 2010. In 2009-10, there were 84,527 knee replace­ments com­pared with 68,500 in 2006–7, while hip replace­ments rose from 65,000 in 2006–7 to 79,413 in 2009-10.

How­ev­er, a recent report in GP mag­a­zine based on a Free­dom of Infor­ma­tion request, shows joint replace­ment pro­ce­dures are being restrict­ed in 59 per cent of pri­ma­ry care trusts (PCTs) to cut costs. This means patients in some areas are being left in pain for long peri­ods before get­ting a replace­ment knee or hip.

This can make their con­di­tion worse, says Joe Dias, pres­i­dent of the British Orthopaedic Asso­ci­a­tion, who points out: “Patients need­ing hip and knee replace­ments gain less ben­e­fit from surgery if they’re made to wait as delay results in fur­ther dete­ri­o­ra­tion.”

The NHS’ own Atlas of Vari­a­tion in Health­care for 2009-10 shows dra­mat­ic dif­fer­ences in access to these oper­a­tions across Eng­land. Much of the vari­a­tion can­not be explained by pop­u­la­tion health needs, and high­lights short­com­ings in the qual­i­ty and val­ue of ser­vices in dif­fer­ent areas.

Min­is­ters have promised to come down hard on PCTs who ration joint replace­ment oper­a­tions. Health Min­is­ter Simon Burns says: “If local health bod­ies stop patients from hav­ing treat­ment on the basis of cost alone we will take action against them. Deci­sions on suit­abil­i­ty for surgery should be made by clin­i­cians based on what is most clin­i­cal­ly appro­pri­ate for the patient and tak­ing the indi­vid­ual patient’s needs into account. No right-think­ing per­son can under­stand how any­one could delay a patient’s treat­ment unnec­es­sar­i­ly.”

By com­par­i­son rheuma­toid arthri­tis is much less com­mon. Around 580,000 peo­ple in the UK have rheuma­toid arthri­tis and three times as many women as men. The dis­ease destroys the syn­ovial mem­brane – a thin lay­er of pro­tec­tive cells around the joints – caus­ing swelling, pain, loss of strength in the joints and fatigue.

Rheuma­toid arthri­tis usu­al­ly starts in the wrists, hands and feet. The symp­toms usu­al­ly start when peo­ple are aged between 35 and 55, and it is thought to be trig­gered by a virus.

Rheuma­toid arthri­tis is an autoim­mune dis­ease, which means it is caused by the body’s immune sys­tem attack­ing its own cells. Pro­fes­sor Isen­berg says: “It’s as if your body sud­den­ly starts con­spir­ing against you. Instead of the white blood cells in your immune sys­tem pro­tect­ing you, they start attack­ing the syn­ovial mem­brane inside your joints. Female hor­mones inter­act with the immune sys­tem and we believe this is why it’s more com­mon in women.”

Though it’s uncom­mon for arthri­tis to be the cause of bone and joint pain in young chil­dren, they can be affect­ed. Juve­nile idio­path­ic arthri­tis affects around one in 1,000 chil­dren. While there is no cure, the symp­toms can be man­aged so chil­dren can enjoy an active life and become an inde­pen­dent adult.

Drugs called dis­ease mod­i­fy­ing anti-rheumat­ic drugs (DMARDs) can slow down the pro­gres­sion of arthri­tis, and NSAIDs can help with the swelling and pain. In the last decade new­er drugs called bio­log­ics have emerged. These tar­get par­tic­u­lar mol­e­cules and cells respon­si­ble for dri­ving the dis­ease.

But a report by the Pol­i­cy Analy­sis Cen­tre found access to bio­log­ics in Eng­land is lim­it­ed and that there is a “lack of will” to tack­le the bur­den of rheuma­toid arthri­tis in Europe.

Tom Hock­ley, co-author of the report, says: “This lack of will is most evi­dent in Eng­land, where access to mod­ern bio­log­ic ther­a­pies is heav­i­ly restrict­ed until a patient’s bur­den of dis­ease has become severe.”

The analy­sis found that 6 per cent of patients were on bio­log­ics in Eng­land, com­pared with 8 per cent in Spain, 11 per cent in Swe­den and 12 per cent in the Nether­lands.

While the Nation­al Insti­tute for Health and Clin­i­cal Excel­lence (NICE) rec­om­mends bio­log­ics when patients have not respond­ed to con­ven­tion­al ther­a­pies, there is vari­a­tion in pre­scrib­ing across the coun­try.

Pro­fes­sor Isen­berg says: “It’s unfor­tu­nate but there are ele­ments of a post­code lot­tery. In spite of NICE’s rec­om­men­da­tion that bio­log­ics should be pre­scribed if a patient has failed to respond to two con­ven­tion­al ther­a­pies, we’re find­ing some PCTs are putting bar­ri­ers in the way. All PCTs should adhere to the guid­ance so that peo­ple with rheuma­toid arthri­tis can get these drugs as soon as they need them.”

Bone and joint health is impor­tant for keep­ing bones strong and pre­vent­ing fragili­ty frac­tures. Every year in the UK there are 300,000 fragili­ty frac­tures. Of these, 89,000 are hip frac­tures. Some 13,800 peo­ple with a frac­ture hip die with­in a year, and half of those who sur­vive will no longer be able to live inde­pen­dent­ly and be in con­stant pain.

Fig­ures from the Nation­al Osteo­poro­sis Soci­ety show that by 2036 there could be 140,000 hos­pi­tal admis­sions a year for hip frac­tures as a result of the age­ing pop­u­la­tion and increas­ing­ly unhealthy lifestyles. The bill could top £6 bil­lion.

Our bones are con­stant­ly being bro­ken down and replaced with new cells. When we are young, we make more bone cells than we lose, but in our thir­ties we start to lose bone mass. Over time this thins and weak­ens the bones and caus­es osteo­poro­sis.

In women this loss is accel­er­at­ed after the menopause because they no longer pro­duce oestro­gen. For women, the life­time risk of a hip frac­ture due to osteo­poro­sis is one in six – greater than their one-in-nine risk of devel­op­ing breast can­cer.

Pro­fes­sor Roger Fran­cis, from the Insti­tute for Age­ing and Health at New­cas­tle Uni­ver­si­ty, says: “While the decline in oestro­gen lev­els after the menopause puts women at risk of osteo­poro­sis, drink­ing, smok­ing and a seden­tary lifestyle are putting more men at risk. By the age of 50, men have a one-in-five risk of frac­ture.”

Drugs called oral bis­pho­s­pho­nates can slow down the rate of bone loss. But wor­ry­ing­ly, almost 40 per cent of PCTs are either under-pre­scrib­ing osteo­poro­sis drugs or are fail­ing to pro­vide ser­vices which could pre­vent peo­ple with osteo­poro­sis from hav­ing anoth­er frac­ture.

Pro­fes­sor Fran­cis says: “Only 50 per cent of those who have had a fragili­ty frac­ture are being assessed or get­ting treat­ment. The sit­u­a­tion has changed lit­tle over the last few years. Some PCTs are still under-pre­scrib­ing and fail­ing to recog­nise the seri­ous­ness of this dis­ease. We need a sys­tem­at­ic approach to ensure those who’ve had a fragili­ty frac­ture are assessed imme­di­ate­ly.”