Sign In

Benefits bring cheer in continuing economic gloom

Despite the UK’s emer­gence from reces­sion and recent pos­i­tive employ­ment news, most employ­ers remain cau­tious. Not sur­pris­ing­ly, this is con­tin­u­ing to fil­ter through into pay pol­i­cy; fig­ures from XpertHR in Octo­ber fore­cast pri­vate-sec­tor salaries would rise by just 2.5 per cent over the next year, bare­ly keep­ing track with infla­tion.

Against this back­drop, the effec­tive use of ben­e­fits to incen­tivise and reward employ­ees becomes even more impor­tant, poten­tial­ly allow­ing employ­ees to make salaries stretch that bit fur­ther in the face of ris­ing costs.

“Organ­i­sa­tions can help employ­ees absorb cost of liv­ing increas­es by pro­vid­ing ben­e­fits they don’t have to buy them­selves or doing deals for them,” says Charles Cot­ton, per­for­mance and reward advis­er at the Char­tered Insti­tute of Per­son­nel and Devel­op­ment (CIPD). This could be through a third-par­ty provider, but doesn’t need to be; small­er firms may be able to have a sim­i­lar impact by approach­ing local busi­ness­es direct­ly for staff dis­counts, he adds.

Yet, while the use of ben­e­fits may be more impor­tant than ever, most employ­ers are reluc­tant to increase the spend­ing and resources they devote to financ­ing such pro­vi­sions, says Kim Honess, UK head of flex­i­ble ben­e­fits at Mer­cer con­sul­tan­cy.

Organ­i­sa­tions can help employ­ees absorb cost of liv­ing increas­es by pro­vid­ing ben­e­fits they don’t have to buy them­selves or doing deals for them

They remain reluc­tant to aban­don core ben­e­fits that have tra­di­tion­al­ly been pro­vid­ed by employ­ers, such as life assur­ance, but might allow indi­vid­u­als to reduce their min­i­mum pro­vi­sion down to one times salary rather than the tra­di­tion­al three or four, she says. This enables employ­ees to pick and choose oth­er ben­e­fits through flex­i­ble ben­e­fit schemes that are more in keep­ing with their cir­cum­stances. “It allows peo­ple to trade more,” says Ms Honess.

Along­side this, the use of vol­un­tary ben­e­fits, where organ­i­sa­tions pro­vide employ­ees with access to a range of addi­tion­al ben­e­fits, has become more com­mon, adding to the array of choice avail­able. “Just hav­ing a longer list of ben­e­fits can also increase the per­ceived val­ue, even if the employ­ee is pay­ing for it,” says Paul Brown, senior con­sul­tant at Tow­ers Wat­son.

Increas­ing­ly, employ­ees are tend­ing to look for ben­e­fits that can make their base pay go fur­ther. “Employ­ees are real­ly see­ing the val­ue of mak­ing sav­ings wher­ev­er they can, whether it’s on child­care or through the pur­chase of dis­count­ed retail vouch­ers, which can enable them to make sav­ings on their every­day expen­di­ture,” says Kuljit Kaur, head of busi­ness devel­op­ment at The Vouch­er Shop.

Where employ­ees are fund­ing ben­e­fits them­selves, either through salary sac­ri­fice arrange­ments or direct­ly with a provider, they can prove even more attrac­tive if they qual­i­fy for tax and nation­al insur­ance sav­ings.

Effec­tive com­mu­ni­ca­tion of just what employ­ers are doing to save employ­ees mon­ey, includ­ing the use of online net pay mod­ellers in vol­un­tary ben­e­fit sys­tems, is impor­tant in ensur­ing staff ful­ly appre­ci­ate what they are get­ting, adds Mr Brown.

Yet ben­e­fits can only go so far in ensur­ing staff remain moti­vat­ed and com­mit­ted to the organ­i­sa­tion, warns the CIPD’s Mr Cot­ton. “If you’re not able to give peo­ple a rea­son­able salary, it doesn’t mat­ter how good your ben­e­fits are because they won’t be able to cope with all the increas­es in liv­ing costs they’ve had to absorb over the last three or four years,” he says.