Sign In

A rising tide of extreme weather

Extreme weath­er has been break­ing records and writ­ing head­lines across the UK in 2020, as the coun­try endures the dou­ble-wham­my impact of storms Cia­ra and Den­nis. Images have flood­ed our screens almost dai­ly of res­i­dents evac­u­at­ed by boat and sod­den fur­ni­ture sub­merged in aban­doned homes.

Infra­struc­ture, though, is arguably the big sto­ry sel­dom told, says Simon Crowther, founder of Flood Pro­tec­tion Solu­tions and him­self a vic­tim of flood­ing as a teenag­er in 2007. “Flood­ing is the biggest threat the UK faces as a result of cli­mate change,” he says. “Yet the response is often reac­tive rather than proac­tive. While media atten­tion is usu­al­ly on those direct­ly affect­ed with flood­ed homes and busi­ness­es, when crit­i­cal infra­struc­ture is at risk, dev­as­ta­tion can be huge.”

Infra­struc­ture is woven through­out the fab­ric of our soci­ety and essen­tial ser­vices soon start to unrav­el in extreme weath­er, espe­cial­ly fol­low­ing dis­rup­tion due to surge tides and flood­ing, explains Dr Andrew Rus­sell, senior ana­lyst at the Com­mit­tee on Cli­mate
Change (CCC).

“Risks to com­mu­ni­ties and local economies are close­ly linked to resilience of local infra­struc­ture, in par­tic­u­lar ener­gy, trans­porta­tion and com­mu­ni­ca­tions sys­tems. Elec­tric­i­ty sub-sta­tions, road and rail net­works, water treat­ment works, ports and air­ports, plus fixed-line and mobile com­mu­ni­ca­tions assets, are all exposed to increas­ing flood risks,” he says.

The CCC advis­es the UK gov­ern­ment on emis­sions tar­gets and reports to par­lia­ment on progress made. Across all infra­struc­ture sec­tors, it has warned that the num­ber of assets and net­works exposed to sig­nif­i­cant lev­els of flood risk could dou­ble by the 2080s.

Fur­ther­more, in its recent report look­ing specif­i­cal­ly at coastal risks, the CCC iden­ti­fied 1,600km of major roads and 650km of rail­way line, and no few­er than 92 rail­way sta­tions and 55 dis­used land­fill sites, all at 0.5 per cent or greater risk of flood­ing or ero­sion by the end of the cen­tu­ry.

Flood risk for insurers and investors

For insur­ers, the num­bers are not just big, but dif­fer­ent. Mar­ket play­ers reliant on tra­di­tion­al cat­a­stro­phe mod­els that fail to con­sid­er for­ward-look­ing cli­mate risk are find­ing the past no longer pro­vides an accu­rate guide to the future, says Emi­lie Maz­za­cu­rati, founder and chief exec­u­tive of Four Twen­ty Sev­en.

“Floods con­sid­ered one-in-five-hun­dred-year events have begun to occur every few years,” she says. “Infra­struc­ture assets planned and built to with­stand his­tor­i­cal con­di­tions are often not pre­pared to endure repeat­ed inun­da­tion, extreme wind or record-break­ing tem­per­a­tures.”

As a pub­lish­er of cli­mate data for finan­cial mar­kets, Four Twen­ty Sev­en risk-scores infra­struc­ture assets, such as pipelines and high­ways. It sees investors increas­ing­ly express­ing con­cern over cli­mate risk and engag­ing with oper­a­tors around their pre­pared­ness, with finan­cial impli­ca­tions, says Maz­za­cu­rati.

Floods con­sid­ered one-in-five-hun­dred-year events have begun to occur every few years

“For munic­i­pal­i­ties seek­ing infra­struc­ture financ­ing, this can catal­yse poli­cies around ensur­ing new projects con­sid­er cli­mate risk. For exam­ple, the province of Ontario in Cana­da requires all cities to inte­grate cli­mate vul­ner­a­bil­i­ty into their infra­struc­ture plan­ning, which can help min­imise costs over time,” she says.

Climate adaptation, not resistance

While major UK infra­struc­ture providers are mak­ing progress boost­ing resilience of exist­ing and future assets, appli­ca­tions of nature-based solu­tions, such as flood­able parks, can work at a land­scap­ing scale and will also appeal to investors, says Bram Miller, tech­ni­cal direc­tor at Ram­boll.

“As invest­ment deci­sions will increas­ing­ly be eval­u­at­ed in terms of nat­ur­al cap­i­tal, this may well dri­ve uptake of more nature-based solu­tions,” he says. “Green infra­struc­ture can not only help man­age flood risks, but also bring added ben­e­fits such as bio­di­ver­si­ty net gain, car­bon seques­tra­tion and pub­lic-ameni­ty uses.”

Defined as the total­i­ty of world stocks of nat­ur­al assets, includ­ing geol­o­gy, soil, air, water and liv­ing things, nat­ur­al cap­i­tal effec­tive­ly cov­ers every­thing from moun­tains to fish. The Office for Nation­al Sta­tis­tics has esti­mat­ed its val­ue to the UK econ­o­my at almost £1 tril­lion.

Much more can be done, how­ev­er, to lever­age poten­tial ben­e­fits of green­ing the built envi­ron­ment, argues pres­i­dent of the Euro­pean Fed­er­a­tion of Green Roof and Wall Asso­ci­a­tions Dusty Gedge.

“We need new mod­els and aware­ness with­in the con­struc­tion indus­try around deal­ing with water at source. Build­ings are respon­si­ble for a lot of rain­wa­ter, which green infra­struc­ture in the form of liv­ing roofs and walls can help man­age,” says Gedge.

The road ahead points towards adapt­abil­i­ty, rather than resis­tance. Crowther con­cludes: “There has been a gen­er­al shift with­in the flood pro­tec­tion indus­try to work with nature, rather than against it. We can’t keep build­ing high­er and high­er walls.”