Sign In

Maritime agreements spark trouble in Horn of Africa

For decades it has been one of the world’s most frag­ile regions, plagued by armed con­flict, pover­ty and peri­od­ic droughts. But in the 1990s, the Horn of Africa, com­pris­ing the states of Soma­lia, Eritrea, Ethiopia and Dji­bouti, became the focus of a some­what sur­pris­ing investor: DP World, a glob­al port oper­a­tor that is major­i­ty owned by the gov­ern­ment of Dubai, part of the Unit­ed Arab Emi­rates (UAE).

We are see­ing a race between region­al and glob­al play­ers to take advan­tage of big oppor­tu­ni­ties locat­ed in the region

From its head­quar­ters in Dubai’s sprawl­ing port of Jebel Ali, the mar­itime com­pa­ny and its Emi­rati own­ers saw in the Horn of Africa what many oth­ers didn’t: an area of vast eco­nom­ic poten­tial and geostrate­gic impor­tance.

In 2006, DP World won a con­tract to build the Doraleh con­tain­er ter­mi­nal in Dji­bouti, now the small nation’s biggest employ­er and source of rev­enue. Years lat­er, in 2016, it signed a $442-mil­lion agree­ment with Somalia’s seces­sion­ist region of Soma­liland, to man­age and invest in the deep-sea port of Berbera. Both deci­sions proved pre­scient.

Middle-Eastern countries battle for space in the Horn of Africa

Today, the UAE is among a num­ber of Gulf and Mid­dle-East­ern coun­tries scram­bling for con­trol of ports across the Horn of Africa, in a race that ana­lysts say could ben­e­fit, but also poten­tial­ly desta­bilise, the already frag­ile east-African region.

In recent years, Sau­di Ara­bia and the UAE have become active in ports and mil­i­tary bases in Dji­bouti, Eritrea and Soma­lia, while Qatar and Turkey, who align with Sau­di Arabia’s region­al rival Iran, are build­ing in the Soma­li cap­i­tal, Mogadishu, and the Red Sea port of Suakin, off the coast of Sudan.

“We are see­ing a race between region­al and glob­al play­ers to take advan­tage of big oppor­tu­ni­ties locat­ed in the region,” says Camille Lons, pro­gramme co-ordi­na­tor at the Euro­pean Coun­cil on For­eign Rela­tions.

One rea­son for this scram­ble is com­mer­cial. The Horn of Africa is strate­gi­cal­ly locat­ed next to one of the world’s busiest sea lanes, with access to both the Red Sea and Indi­an Ocean. Every day around five mil­lion bar­rels of crude and petro­le­um prod­ucts flow through the Bab el-Man­deb Strait, a neck of water bor­dered by Eritrea and Dji­bouti.

“It is one of most traf­ficked ship­ping lanes in the world,” says Olivi­er Mil­land, a polit­i­cal risk ana­lyst at Allan & Asso­ciates.

Political rivalry meets commercial interest 

More ports and bet­ter infra­struc­ture are also need­ed to han­dle growth in the Horn of Africa’s largest econ­o­my, Ethiopia, which is pre­dict­ed to expand by 8.5 per cent this year, but is land­locked and there­fore heav­i­ly depen­dent on Dji­bouti.

Since sweep­ing to pow­er in April, Ethiopia’s new, reform-mind­ed prime min­is­ter Abiy Ahmed, 42, has made port devel­op­ment a key pri­or­i­ty, call­ing for invest­ments across the region.

“It is very impor­tant for Ethiopia to diver­si­fy its trad­ing streams,” says Mr Mil­land.

But Gulf inter­est in the Horn of Africa is also being dri­ven by region­al polit­i­cal rival­ries, with dif­fer­ent states seek­ing to secure strate­gic loca­tions, espe­cial­ly in the con­text of the war in Yemen, where a mil­i­tary coali­tion led by Sau­di Ara­bia and the UAE has been fight­ing Iran­ian-backed Houthi rebels since March 2015.

The UAE has been launch­ing oper­a­tions in Yemen from a mil­i­tary base around the Eritre­an port of Assab and also has armed forces present in Berbera, a port in Soma­liland.

Will tensions spill over to conflict in the Horn of Africa?

As geopo­lit­i­cal inter­est in the Horn increas­es, observers fear these region­al Gulf rival­ries could end up spilling over.

This was the case after the Gulf cri­sis of June 2017, when Sau­di Ara­bia and its allies sev­ered diplo­mat­ic ties with Qatar, which they accuse of sup­port­ing Iran, the Mus­lim Broth­er­hood and a form of polit­i­cal Islam which threat­ens the sta­bil­i­ty of their regimes.

Dur­ing the cri­sis, the gov­ern­ments of Dji­bouti and Eritrea sided with Sau­di Ara­bia and the UAE, caus­ing Qatar to with­draw peace­keep­ers from a dis­put­ed bor­der between the two Horn of Africa coun­tries, where they had been patrolling since 2010.

Somalia’s break­away region of Soma­liland, which is not inter­na­tion­al­ly recog­nised as an inde­pen­dent coun­try, also chose the side of Sau­di Ara­bia and the UAE, while the cen­tral gov­ern­ment in Mogadishu, which is clos­er to Qatar and Turkey, stayed neu­tral.

Ana­lysts say this has ampli­fied dan­ger­ous divi­sions between Soma­lia and its regions, a divide that can be seen most clear­ly in Berbera, an ancient port town in Soma­liland.

UAE and Somali rivalries meet and merge

Last year the UAE began con­struct­ing a mil­i­tary base in Berbera, which is 190km south of Yemen. In March this year, DP World also finalised a con­tract with the Soma­liland author­i­ties to devel­op and oper­ate Berbera’s port, in which Ethiopia also has a 19 per cent stake.

The ven­ture has the poten­tial to turn Soma­liland into a region­al mar­itime hub, but has prompt­ed a furi­ous response from Somalia’s fed­er­al gov­ern­ment which regards the region as part of its ter­ri­to­ry and says the seces­sion­ists have no right to sign inter­na­tion­al agree­ments.

“The deal has been per­ceived as a for­eign intru­sion by Mogadishu,” says Ms Lons.

On March 12, Somalia’s fed­er­al par­lia­ment took the step of ban­ning DP World from oper­at­ing in the coun­try in a move Somaliland’s pres­i­dent Muse Bihi Abdi referred to as a dec­la­ra­tion of war.

The cri­sis has since soured rela­tions between Mogadishu and the UAE. In April, Soma­li secu­ri­ty forces con­fis­cat­ed mil­lions of “unde­clared” US dol­lars from a UAE plane land­ing in the cap­i­tal. The UAE respond­ed by end­ing a mil­i­tary train­ing pro­gramme it was run­ning in Soma­lia.

Maritime agreements playing newly strategic role on global stage

Despite its long-stand­ing involve­ment in the region, the UAE has also run into prob­lems in Dji­bouti. In Feb­ru­ary, fol­low­ing years of dis­pute, the Dji­bouti gov­ern­ment dra­mat­i­cal­ly seized con­trol of the DP World-oper­at­ed and part-owned Doraleh Con­tain­er Ter­mi­nal.

The Dji­bouti gov­ern­ment accused the com­pa­ny of poor per­for­mance and fail­ing to expand the ter­mi­nal as quick­ly as it had promised. It also claimed the com­pa­ny paid bribes to secure the orig­i­nal con­ces­sion, a claim reject­ed by the Lon­don Court of Inter­na­tion­al Arbi­tra­tion.

You have the largest Mid­dle-East­ern mar­itime logis­tics ship­per DP World in an implic­it, for­ward-look­ing con­test with anoth­er glob­al ship­ping alliance, which includes the Chi­nese — David Styan, Lec­tur­er in pol­i­tics, Birk­beck, Uni­ver­si­ty of Lon­don

With the UAE side­lined in Dji­bouti, ana­lysts say oth­er coun­tries could step in and that Gulf nations aren’t the only ones in the run­ning. Some have spec­u­lat­ed that the Dji­bouti gov­ern­ment may hand over Doraleh to investors from Chi­na, which is cur­rent­ly build­ing a naval base in the coun­try.

The involve­ment of Chi­na in the Horn of Africa’s ports adds “anoth­er dimen­sion to an already com­pli­cat­ed equa­tion”, says David Styan a lec­tur­er in pol­i­tics at Birk­beck, Uni­ver­si­ty of Lon­don.

“You have the largest Mid­dle-East­ern mar­itime logis­tics ship­per DP World in an implic­it, for­ward-look­ing con­test with anoth­er glob­al ship­ping alliance, which includes the Chi­nese,” Dr Styan adds.

But as dif­fer­ent nations scram­ble for con­trol of ports in the Horn of Africa, Mr Mil­land says it is worth remem­ber­ing that the region is still prone to insta­bil­i­ty. Soma­lia is deal­ing with the threat of resilient al-Shabaab mil­i­tants, Eritrea remains one of the world’s most repres­sive coun­tries, and even Ethiopia, con­sid­ered rel­a­tive­ly sta­ble, is cur­rent­ly fac­ing wide­spread eth­nic vio­lence and dis­place­ment.

“The area has huge com­mer­cial poten­tial,” Mr Mil­land con­cludes, “but there are still region­al and coun­try ten­sions that could put new invest­ments at real risk.”