Sign In

Decision to leave workers’ rights out of Queen’s Speech criticised

The employ­ment bill, which was first pro­posed in 2019, includ­ed mea­sures to make hybrid work­ing the default for employ­ers but was not includ­ed in the government’s par­lia­men­tary plans


Prince Charles, Prince of Wales reads the Queen’s Speech in the House of Lords Cham­ber, dur­ing the State Open­ing of Par­lia­ment (Get­ty Images)

The omis­sion of the long-await­ed employ­ment bill from yesterday’s (10 May) Queen’s Speech has been described as a “missed oppor­tu­ni­ty”, with organ­i­sa­tions warn­ing of a grow­ing need to pro­tect the rights of work­ers.

The pro­pos­als for leg­isla­tive change were first put for­ward by the gov­ern­ment in 2019. They promised to ensure all work­ers had access to flex­i­ble work­ing arrange­ments, to improve pro­tec­tions against preg­nan­cy dis­crim­i­na­tion, to intro­duce a sin­gle enforce­ment body to over­see employ­ment rights and to pre­vent the prac­tice of employ­ers tak­ing work­ers’ tips. 

Ben Will­mott, head of pol­i­cy for the Char­tered Insti­tute of Pro­fes­sion­al Devel­op­ment, says the exclu­sion of the bill from the government’s leg­isla­tive agen­da was “a missed oppor­tu­ni­ty to improve labour mar­ket enforce­ment”. 

“There is a grow­ing need to pro­tect the rights of work­ers, par­tic­u­lar­ly the low­er paid and more vul­ner­a­ble who are fac­ing mount­ing finan­cial pres­sure. The recent sack­ing of work­ers, with­out notice, by P&O Fer­ries shows that much more needs to be done to ensure unscrupu­lous employ­ers can­not ignore their legal respon­si­bil­i­ties and under­cut employ­ment stan­dards in the UK,” he adds.  

How­ev­er, Will­mott was hope­ful there would still be room for the gov­ern­ment to boost the avail­abil­i­ty of flex­i­ble work­ing by intro­duc­ing the right to request flex­i­ble work­ing arrange­ments from the first day of employ­ment. 

Philip Richard­son, part­ner and head of employ­ment law at Stephen­sons, also expressed his dis­ap­point­ment at the fact that the employ­ment bill was not among the 38 pieces of leg­is­la­tion announced ahead of the new par­lia­men­tary year.

“The world of work has trans­formed over the past two years and cur­rent leg­is­la­tion isn’t ade­quate­ly pro­tect­ing employ­ees,” he says. “Oth­er pro­tec­tions against things like preg­nan­cy dis­crim­i­na­tion and fair tip­ping have also tak­en a back seat as a result of this omis­sion, giv­ing the upper hand to rogue employ­ers.”

The gov­ern­ment has pre­vi­ous­ly promised to make the UK “the best place to work in the world”. In response to the back­lash it told the BBC it has a “strong track record in sup­port­ing work­ers” and is focused on deliv­er­ing pri­or­i­ties includ­ing grow­ing the econ­o­my that will help work­ers.

Nev­er­the­less, Trades Union Con­gress gen­er­al sec­re­tary Frances O’Grady claims that the omis­sion of the bill “means vital rights that min­is­ters had promised risk being ditched for good” and accused the gov­ern­ment of “turn­ing its back on work­ers”. 

How­ev­er, Liz Sebag-Mon­te­fiore, co-founder of HR con­sul­tan­cy 10Eighty, believes that many of the pro­posed laws in the bill cov­ered rights that good employ­ers should already be look­ing to pro­vide. 

“The things that would be cov­ered by this leg­is­la­tion are rights that fair employ­ers will see as cru­cial to the well­be­ing of their employ­ees,” she says. “They recog­nise that employ­ee engage­ment and pro­duc­tiv­i­ty are enhanced when work­ers are treat­ed fair­ly.”

Audit and corporate governance reform

The need to improve pro­tec­tions of work­ers rights was recent­ly high­light­ed by P&O Fer­ries’ treat­ment of its staff, 800 of which were sacked with­out notice, only to be replaced by cheap­er agency work­ers. 

The Bet­ter Busi­ness Act, a coali­tion of busi­ness­es cam­paign­ing for cor­po­rate gov­er­nance reform, were hope­ful that their pro­pos­als to ele­vate the inter­ests of work­ers, the envi­ron­ment and wider soci­ety in the Com­pa­nies Act would be includ­ed in the Queen’s Speech too.

Its cam­paign direc­tor Chris Turn­er claims that the fail­ure to address the need to update cor­po­rate gov­er­nance rules has left the pri­vate sec­tor “none the wis­er as to what role the prime min­is­ter wants busi­ness to play in help­ing Britain recov­er from the pan­dem­ic”. 

He adds: “With urgent prob­lems such as cli­mate change and inequal­i­ty at the fore­front of pol­i­cy deci­sions, the world needs busi­ness to play its part in pro­tect­ing peo­ple and the plan­et.”

The Insti­tute of Direc­tors also see this as an issue that needs to urgent­ly be addressed. Although they were over­looked in the speech, which was deliv­ered by Prince Charles, the pro­fes­sion­al organ­i­sa­tion shared its relief that the gov­ern­ment still has plans to pub­lish a draft of its audit reform bill and called for any changes to be imple­ment­ed quick­ly. 

Its pol­i­cy direc­tor Dr Roger Bark­er says: “Recent scan­dals, such as Car­il­lion, BHS and P&O Fer­ries, have shown that there are gaps in our cor­po­rate gov­er­nance frame­work, reduc­ing trust in British busi­ness. A year on from the government’s white paper, these wide­ly sup­port­ed and uncon­tro­ver­sial changes are now long over­due and we would urge the gov­ern­ment to ensure that the pro­pos­als are imple­ment­ed in a time­ly fash­ion.”