Sign In

Hybrid working: companies must address digital inequality

Faced with seri­ous con­se­quences, busi­ness lead­ers are increas­ing­ly con­cerned about the impact of dig­i­tal inequal­i­ty among employ­ees


Spon­sored by

Actu­al Expe­ri­ence

The advent of hybrid work­ing offers an oppor­tu­ni­ty for employ­ees to choose when, where and how they work. It can also pro­mote well­be­ing and help cre­ate a bet­ter work/life bal­ance. How­ev­er, it could also widen equal­i­ty gaps in the work­place.

A com­mon exam­ple is employ­ees work­ing on dif­fer­ent con­ti­nents – or even dif­fer­ent regions with­in the UK – that use dif­fer­ent infra­struc­ture and have a dif­fer­ent home broad­band set­up.

A recent report from peo­ple ana­lyt­ics and con­sult­ing com­pa­ny, Actu­al Expe­ri­ence, reveals organ­i­sa­tions are becom­ing increas­ing­ly con­cerned about the impact of dig­i­tal inequal­i­ty on employ­ees, as hybrid work­ing looks set to become the new nor­mal.

Indeed, 67% of C‑suite rep­re­sen­ta­tives sur­veyed say they’re wor­ried these new ways of work­ing will intro­duce inequal­i­ties in how peo­ple access and use dig­i­tal tools.

And for good rea­son. The com­pa­ny has found that, on aver­age, 10% of an organisation’s employ­ees need to work an extra six days per year to do the same work as their col­leagues.
“Our data reveals the hid­den cost of an uneven play­ing field in the dig­i­tal work­place. These six days of wast­ed time would mean a reduced work/life bal­ance and increased work stress due to the frus­tra­tion,” says Actu­al Expe­ri­ence co-founder and CEO, Dave Page.

A fail­ure to look after employ­ees — the ‘social’ in ESG — can have a detri­men­tal effect on a business’s val­ue to its investors

“This could also impact on time they could oth­er­wise spend on per­son­al or pro­fes­sion­al devel­op­ment, thus lim­it­ing their oppor­tu­ni­ties for career growth,” says Page. “To the busi­ness, this means reduced work out­put, lost rev­enue, and wast­ed pay­roll. For larg­er clients, we’ve seen this run into sev­en-fig­ure sums. Worst case sce­nario, if issues are not iden­ti­fied and fixed, staff may resign.”

Oth­er dis­par­i­ties can occur clos­er to home, per­haps where the inter­net in dif­fer­ent regions of the UK varies great­ly in qual­i­ty. Employ­ees with more dis­pos­able income might be more like­ly to pur­chase high­er-qual­i­ty broad­band to access dig­i­tal tools reli­ably and quick­ly – but this may not be afford­able for every­one.

Despite busi­ness lead­ers’ con­cerns about the impact of dig­i­tal inequal­i­ty, there are wor­ry­ing signs in terms of busi­ness pre­pared­ness for mak­ing hybrid work in the long term.
Actu­al Expe­ri­ence reports that few­er than one in five (18%) believe they have a ‘very effec­tive’ under­stand­ing of the dig­i­tal needs of dif­fer­ent employ­ees.

This will cause a prob­lem when it comes to hir­ing and retain­ing employ­ees, says Page.
“CHROs are going through that jour­ney right now. Busi­ness lead­ers are real­is­ing that, in the world of hybrid or remote work­ing, it’s now very easy for employ­ees to move to a new employ­er. They are no longer lim­it­ed geo­graph­i­cal­ly. There­fore, the land­scape has become more com­pet­i­tive, and CHROs are all too aware that, to attract and retain the best tal­ent, they need to ensure that the employ­ee expe­ri­ence is pos­i­tive – not just for big mile­stone moments but for the day-to-day too.”

How­ev­er, Page con­tends that the dig­i­tal aspects of work have for too long exist­ed in a sep­a­rate silo from the employ­ee expe­ri­ence aspects. CIOs, who own the dig­i­tal expe­ri­ence, have not been suf­fi­cient­ly aligned with peo­ple lead­ers, who own employ­ee expe­ri­ence. As a result, com­pa­nies’ under­stand­ing of broad­er employ­ee expe­ri­ence has been frag­ment­ed.

There are also some wor­ry­ing indi­ca­tions that organ­i­sa­tions aren’t act­ing on employ­ees’ wor­ries or com­plaints regard­ing their tech prob­lems. Only 19% have a very good under­stand­ing of the link between dig­i­tal tools and employ­ee well­be­ing.

“Typ­i­cal­ly, employ­ers will run employ­ee sur­veys to iden­ti­fy any issues. How­ev­er, while sur­veys can be very use­ful, it only shows a snap­shot of data at that time. Addi­tion­al­ly, sur­veys are often anonymised, rely on the employ­ee accu­rate­ly report­ing the issue they’re expe­ri­enc­ing, and do not offer insight on what the prob­lem is,” says Page.

Clear­ly, a fail­ure to ‘lev­el up’ those hybrid work­ers suf­fer­ing in silence can have seri­ous con­se­quences.

“Our reports iden­ti­fy mil­lions in lost rev­enue oppor­tu­ni­ty and wast­ed pay­roll due to time wast­ed and reduced busi­ness out­put,” says Page.

He believes a fail­ure to look after employ­ees – the ‘social’ in ESG – can have a detri­men­tal effect on a busi­ness’ val­ue to its investors. With more and more investors pri­ori­tis­ing ESG ini­tia­tives as a fac­tor in decid­ing where to invest, com­pa­nies which do not look after their peo­ple may suf­fer the con­se­quences of reduced share price and neg­a­tive atten­tion in the media.

So, what can CHROs do to suc­cess­ful­ly nav­i­gate this prob­lem and man­age the new dis­trib­uted work­force?

“This is a great oppor­tu­ni­ty for CHROs to act as a lynch­pin between the HR/people func­tion and IT to ensure that the right data points are con­tin­u­ous­ly mon­i­tored and analysed, with tech issues inves­ti­gat­ed,” says Page.

To help ful­fil this, Actu­al Expe­ri­ence pro­duces data ana­lyt­ics which act as a sur­vey of all employ­ees but with­out the need for any employ­ee inter­ac­tion. Unlike employ­ee expe­ri­ence sur­veys, which offer a snap­shot of data at a par­tic­u­lar time, it’s always-on peo­ple ana­lyt­ics offer mea­sure­ments insight on root caus­es, over a peri­od of time.
“We also iden­ti­fy pre­cise­ly where and why the prob­lems are occur­ring so we can advise on how best to over­come them, for exam­ple for spe­cif­ic employ­ees requir­ing sup­port, or for spe­cif­ic areas of tech that require invest­ment,” says Page.

“Larg­er organ­i­sa­tions are under pres­sure to report on ESG ini­tia­tives in their annu­al report. Our Con­tin­u­ous Improve­ment Process of month­ly or quar­ter­ly reports enables busi­ness lead­ers to report on tan­gi­ble improve­ments in areas such as equal­i­ty and inclu­sion and car­bon emis­sions.”

The tran­si­tion to new ways of work­ing is the great­est man­age­ment chal­lenge that com­pa­nies have faced in decades. Com­pa­nies need to under­stand how and why inequal­i­ties emerge in dif­fer­ent work­ing mod­els and the usage of dig­i­tal tools.

The con­se­quences of fail­ing to ensure that staff have the tools they need to do their best work, no mat­ter where they are, can be huge­ly detri­men­tal to employ­ees and employ­ers alike. For employ­ees, it can stunt their per­son­al and pro­fes­sion­al devel­op­ment of employ­ees, lim­it upwards mobil­i­ty, and widen equal­i­ty gaps. For organ­i­sa­tions, it can make sus­tain­able busi­ness growth unachiev­able.

If HR/people lead­ers get hybrid right, they can pave the way for a fair­er, more pro­duc­tive employ­ee expe­ri­ence, a pos­i­tive work­ing cul­ture, a strength­ened pur­pose and bet­ter align­ment between the cus­tomer and employ­ee expe­ri­ence.

For more infor­ma­tion please vis­it actual-experience.com


Spon­sored by

Actu­al Expe­ri­ence